AI ? Yes or no

[Kevin D Pem]

Would you like to see AI results eliminated from this forum?

 

[turbopilot]

Would you like to see AI results eliminated from this forum?

And everyone voting yes gets a free one year membership in the Luddite Club of America.

 

[Rosy]

Would you like to see AI results eliminated from this forum?

Could you word the question on the poll itself less ambiguously, please?

 

[Raydawg]

Why?
I go back to no TV, only a radio, then once we had a TV, you actually had to get your butt up off the couch and turn it on/off, volume, up or down, and switch channels.

Yes, life was a beech.

I think AI might be a winning proposition as it will actually make people THINK and investigate to see if what they are seeing, hearing is actually reality.
On the economy, like any other advancements in society it comes at a cost, how it actually plays out, we won't really know, HOWEVER, negativity and bad news will always draw in folks, like a flame does a moth.

We just purchased a new car, the technology is amazing, and much safer to drive......
HOWEVER, I still must put my butt on the seat, to go somewheres.....

 

[CaptainGizmo]

Honestly, I see ZERO purpose for a HUMAN USER forum. I come here to talk to REAL people, honestly, no matter how much negative that carries with it.

I can't imagine anyone disagreeing with the fact that if we wanted to "hear AI's opinion", we'd ask for it...elsewhere; like Grok, Chat, Gemini, etc.

It's hard enough to cipher through people's responses who've merely used "AI" for the answer to your question. Again, my humble opinion is the age-old phrase: "if I wanted your (AI) opinion, I'll ask for it."

~This reply was auto-generated by a human brain, typed with human fingers taught by typing class in 7th grade, and with 66 years of aging of imperfection. Any grammatical or spelling errors are purely human oversight to add authenticity.~

 

[turbopilot]

Honestly, I see ZERO purpose for a HUMAN USER forum. I come here to talk to REAL people, honestly, no matter how much negative that carries with it.

But the problem is you will not know what "brain" is talking. I guess you have not noticed many posters are just copy/pasting an AI response and representing it as their own. I think the best solution (if we need one) is that we ask anyone pasting an AI response to clearly give that response proper attribution, just like we do with copyrighted material, then the forum participant knows who is talking. Hard to enforce but it would just be a recommendation for participants in the forum.