Holdmybeer
RVF Supporter
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2023
- Messages
- 489
- RV Year
- 2016
- RV Make
- Jayco
- RV Model
- Alante 31 AL
- RV Length
- 32’
- Chassis
- F53
- Engine
- 6.8L V10
- TOW/TOAD
- Nissan Frontier Pro 4X
- Fulltimer
- No
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Take a chill pill friend, the facts are trailer drive systems have zero impact on hitch weight and arguable impact on sway. Any argument contrary to your own don't necessarily constitute heresy or necessitate disparagement of anyone who doesn't agree with you.I am amazed at the number of self nominated experts who show up on Internet forums to pontificate about the subject of proper application of weight distribution hitches.
Obviously, a few contributors to this thread have not read all the facts in context. Last April I had the chance to pull a prototype Lightship with my F-150 PowerBoost. That 3 hours of driving was done with two Lightship employees on board, one of them an engineer monitoring the Lightship via a tablet to the LightShip telematics system.
We made the trip without a weight distribution hitch because we were interested to see how it would perform without a WDH. Also at that stage of testing LightShip was finding that not all weight distribution hitches were compatible with the LightShip force sensors in the hitch. I posted my experience with that test drive and posted my thoughts about the application of WDH's with the low profile, electric propulsion systems of this unique towable.
But for the customer who purchases a Lightship today every rig comes with a Curt 17052 WDH as standard equipment and the suggestion to use it. This hitch as been tested to assure compatibility with the TrekDrive hitch mounted force sensors.
So for all you "Dudes" who post before reading the facts, take some time to understand the context. More importantly understand the LightShip represents new to the world technology that may have some features which appear to defy conventional wisdom of the established towable RV crowd.
the facts are trailer drive systems have zero impact on hitch weight
Hey Dude I truly apologize as this forum format is different to me. I am having a hard time cluing into to who is saying what. My comment about the trek drive effecting tongue weight was not from you but many others who think it does. I am very impressed that Lightship is including the WDH. I do have not heard of any other manufacturers who does this. It did seem like you were implying, for all the mentioned reason that they are not nessassary. Maybe I miss read that. From one dude to another peace, love and tranquility bro.I am amazed at the number of self nominated experts who show up on Internet forums to pontificate about the subject of proper application of weight distribution hitches.
Obviously, a few contributors to this thread have not read all the facts in context. Last April I had the chance to pull a prototype Lightship with my F-150 PowerBoost. That 3 hours of driving was done with two Lightship employees on board, one of them an engineer monitoring the Lightship via a tablet to the LightShip telematics system.
We made the trip without a weight distribution hitch because we were interested to see how it would perform without a WDH. Also at that stage of testing LightShip was finding that not all weight distribution hitches were compatible with the LightShip force sensors in the hitch. I posted my experience with that test drive and posted my thoughts about the application of WDH's with the low profile, electric propulsion systems of this unique towable.
But for the customer who purchases a Lightship today every rig comes with a Curt 17052 WDH as standard equipment and the suggestion to use it. This hitch as been tested to assure compatibility with the TrekDrive hitch mounted force sensors.
So for all you "Dudes" who post before reading the facts, take some time to understand the context. More importantly understand the LightShip represents new to the world technology that may have some features which appear to defy conventional wisdom of the established towable RV crowd.
These forums can be confusing particularly when misinformation is spread on purpose. Usually the problem is someone pops into the discussion on page 2 and has not read the thread from the beginning for context.Hey Dude I truly apologize as this forum format is different to me.
Rory,To be clear here, on-road and in-camp safety is the number one priority for Lightship. Followed closely by the health of our customers when using the product (it's why we use no wood in the product!)
It is always best to follow the recommendation of the tow vehicle manufacturer in using weight distribution and sway control devices.
But, we do think that the low center of gravity and low aerodynamic profile of the lightship make it particularly stable on the road, trekdrive on or off. We have also done extensive dynamics simulations and testing to make sure that customers feel safe when towing.
Would welcome anyone here to swing by our factory in Colorado and we'll show you how we build it and give you a test drive!
You haven't stoked any fires as far as I'm aware. It should be made clear however that contrary to what the title of the thread implies Self Propelled has nothing to do with static hitch weight, it does have everything to do with linear force, but those aren't to be conflated, and whether or not a WDH is necessary nor likely much if anything to do with sway control. Sway occurs when it is induced, the Lightship's profile and weight distribution ( center of gravity) are the factors relative to inhibiting sway, not it's drive system and even if the drive system hypothetically were a factor, what about when the drive system is off?Totally get it. We went without the WDH primarily for testing purposes, as we are trying to accumulate miles in all cases a customer might see on the road (whether advised or not). In practice, our user interface does ask the customer if they are using a weight distribution hitch ahead of enabling trekdrive. (And recommends it).
We also run new buyers through a 4 hour orientation on the day of delivery that includes a tow demo, and we provide advice on properly loading the trailer, using WDH (with/without sway control), and managing cargo.
Sorry for stoking a fire here!![]()
Thank you Neal, AI is precisely why I comment on threads like this.I am revising my previous reply here (which I deleted). Let's just keep it civil please, I'll leave it at that.
Thank you.
It was that thread title that caused me to jump in. Coming from the off-road trailer space there are so many very heavy models with articulating hitches that can't take a WDH. Rigs that have over 1,000 pounds of tongue weight being pulled by 1/2 trucks. I mention this to owners, dealers and manufactures that most 1/2 ton trucks are limited to 500 pounds dead tongue weight capacity and they get all bent and act like I am making stuff up. Typical response is. " I have driven my trailer 10,000 miles like this and everything is fine" or "it feels fine to me no sway " or " I have air bags and dont have any squat at all". So I am not trolling just trying to help people roll safely. I do apologize for the "dude" references that was me being a wise arse.Totally get it. We went without the WDH primarily for testing purposes, as we are trying to accumulate miles in all cases a customer might see on the road (whether advised or not). In practice, our user interface does ask the customer if they are using a weight distribution hitch ahead of enabling trekdrive. (And recommends it).
We also run new buyers through a 4 hour orientation on the day of delivery that includes a tow demo, and we provide advice on properly loading the trailer, using WDH (with/without sway control), and managing cargo.
Sorry for stoking a fire here!![]()
No problem from our side, we like the debate!It was that thread title that caused me to jump in. Coming from the off-road trailer space there are so many very heavy models with articulating hitches that can't take a WDH. Rigs that have over 1,000 pounds of tongue weight being pulled by 1/2 trucks. I mention this to owners, dealers and manufactures that most 1/2 ton trucks are limited to 500 pounds dead tongue weight capacity and they get all bent and act like I am making stuff up. Typical response is. " I have driven my trailer 10,000 miles like this and everything is fine" or "it feels fine to me no sway " or " I have air bags and dont have any squat at all". So I am not trolling just trying to help people roll safely. I do apologize for the "dude" references that was me being a wise arse.
However, keep in mind for example a typical class III hitch ordinarily found on 1/2 ton trucks would have two hitch weight limitations. One is standard tongue weight/weight carrying( WC) 500 lbs and the other is tongue weight with a WDH/ weight distribution( WD) 800 lbs. Additionally and this is where folks can become animated, that same hitch with a WDH goes from a 5k to an 8k. ** attributed to leveraging weight ( downward force) off the hitch and rear frame (stress) of the TV.It was that thread title that caused me to jump in. Coming from the off-road trailer space there are so many very heavy models with articulating hitches that can't take a WDH. Rigs that have over 1,000 pounds of tongue weight being pulled by 1/2 trucks. I mention this to owners, dealers and manufactures that most 1/2 ton trucks are limited to 500 pounds dead tongue weight capacity and they get all bent and act like I am making stuff up. Typical response is. " I have driven my trailer 10,000 miles like this and everything is fine" or "it feels fine to me no sway " or " I have air bags and dont have any squat at all". So I am not trolling just trying to help people roll safely. I do apologize for the "dude" references that was me being a wise arse.