Welcome to RVForums.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest RV Community on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, review campgrounds
  • Get the most out of the RV Lifestyle
  • Invite everyone to RVForums.com and let's have fun
  • Commercial/Vendors welcome

What are the best reasons why there aren't any "Gas Pushers" in Class A RVs?

Welcome to RVForums.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends and let's have fun
  • Commercial/Vendors welcome
  • Friendliest RV community on the web

gfmucci

RVF Regular
Joined
Sep 18, 2021
Messages
91
What are the best reasons why there aren't any "Gas Pushers" in Class A RVs? It would seem that the small ones (<34') could benefit: less engine noise up front, more basement storage because no long driveshaft.
 
We see gas coaches in Class A parks. Some of them also have a size limit. Judy D
 
Last edited:
Search Workhorse UFO. They quit making them years ago.
 
Major drawback is radiator air flow!
 
It also would be an RV specific chassis setup and the quantities wouldn’t justify the cost of producing such a chassis. The F53 can also be sold for commercial applications
 
What are the best reasons why there aren't any "Gas Pushers" in Class A RVs? It would seem that the small ones (<34') could benefit: less engine noise up front, more basement storage because no long driveshaft.
One word, economics. GM originally designed the Workhorse chassis to replace the P30/P32 gas 350/454 chassis. The UFO version of the Workhorse was available as a gas pusher OR a diesel pusher. The economic events of 2009 killed it.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top