Welcome to RVForums.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest RV Community on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, review campgrounds
  • Get the most out of the RV Lifestyle
  • Invite everyone to RVForums.com and let's have fun
  • Commercial/Vendors welcome

Weight Distribution and Sway Control -Obsolete for a Self Propelled Trailers?

Welcome to our community

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends and let's have fun
  • Commercial/Vendors welcome
  • Friendliest RV community on the web
The failure in this thread is relying on AI to offer real results, when it relies on published sales literature for it's argument.

And humans never do this, right?
 
And humans never do this, right?
Humans do! However AI has of yet failed to include true reasoning. Those humans that are limited in reasoning default to AI for their path forward.

I do ask AI to help troubleshoot systems! However,using AI as anything other than a tool to offer suggestions in the process is foolishness.

That is why using AI on a forum to offer opinions, and prove sales literature as an acceptable practice, diminishes the value of said forum. Hopefully that practice will be banned in the future.

For the record. I use AI. I am aware of it's limitations. I can reason when it is used to push an agenda, and I find it disgusting. My guess is I'm not alone!
 
Kevin is right. Using AI on forums causes self validation by the AI, confuses those that don’t understand AI, and adds no value to the typical discussions.

I too use AI very heavily. I have a significant investment in my privately owned AI farms with multiple various LLMs and use cases.

Most people do not truly understand AI, and treat it like a conversation or chat. For those that do that my recommendation is to treat each interaction as a web search and ask for the reference material and then read and research it your self.
 
Hopefully that practice will be banned in the future.

Impossible to do. I use AI on the forum "fully exposed" as AI. Others will plagiarize AI, posting content as their own words. That is when it gets off the rails. I try not to do that.

AI is here and we are going to have to make peace with it. AI is not perfect in the collection of knowledge, just like humans. But it is the future whether we like it or not.

There is a gray line between using AI to enrich your knowledge then posting that knowledge and letting AI speak for itself. I don't know how we will sort all that out, but we are not going to "ban" our way out of this. It is here now and taking over all aspects of our life whether we agree or not.
 
Turbo pilot:

I was personally more interested in your data driven approach and explanation of the WD hitch. You made a solid case. You used first hand knowledge and your research to back it up.

I remained engaged as you defended it and appreciated the back and forth discussion based on old methods and new methods.

You brought AI into the conversation and detailed the entire focus by doing so.

Take from my opinion what you wish, just giving you my raw thoughts.
 
Turbo pilot said:

I am the only one with any experience actually towing, measuring and setting up this PowerBoost/LightShip vehicle with WDH systems. So how about giving me a little credit that I am approaching a controversial subject with diligent science and analysis.

This is a strong argument. For me this is all that was needed to prove the point.


Minions Mic Drop GIF
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom