Older coaches have their share of structural, mechanical, fuel system, and house issues as well and once you learn to finer points of caring for, and coping with, modern emissions systems, they become manageable and its easy enough to prevent serious problems.
Right now I’m stranded because of metal fatigue in my CAC (and related problems caused by it) and its only seven years old. And while seven years isn't very old, its old enough that OE parts are no longer available and there are exactly two after market coolers available - neither closer than three to five days by truck freight. So while there are pros and cons to both, I can’t logically conclude that older is better.
When I was having emissions problems (as I learned about the systems and how to live with them) I considered a very nice 2009 500hp Monaco Bishop IV. Sometimes I wish I’d made the change but chances are I would be just as vulnerable to becoming stranded for non-emissions related issues, exactly as I am now.
Having gained an understanding of modern emissions and especially with the advent of the DSS (
DEF Sensor Simulator) I’d opt for newer rather than older at this point. Also your emissions system is under warranty for 5 years/100,000 miles - don’t ever let anyone tell you different. And if you do have emissions issues there is a lot of information available on the forums to help get you through.
This is just my .02 worth and I’m feeling a little negative right now, going on a week in a hotel waiting for parts and losing my slot at the service center (and spending every bit of my Mothership budget on unexpected repairs) but I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about both sides of this issue, and frankly at this point I’m leaning towards neither. Hopefully that will change by the end of the week.