Welcome to RVForums.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest RV Community on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, review campgrounds
  • Get the most out of the RV Lifestyle
  • Invite everyone to RVForums.com and let's have fun
  • Commercial/Vendors welcome

Spartan chassis owners, be aware.

Welcome to RVForums.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends and let's have fun
  • Commercial/Vendors welcome
  • Friendliest RV community on the web
 
Here is another story on the matter. Just keeping the information posted to this thread for those interested and/or affected. No bias, just adding any information relevant to the matter that becomes available as I find it or others that want to share.

 
WOW!! The "PLOT" thickens!
"He said"!
"She said"!
And apparently, we still do not know the truth!
Were I a Newmar, "SPARTAN" chassis owner, I would have a siginificant concern!
What's the outcome?
What say you??

QUESTION: After watching "Lehto's Law" video, and the comment made about inspecting several "Newmar's" at a Dealership, the "NHSTA" representivive stated that "NONE of the stickers affixed, are in compliance with Federal Law"!!! Does that mean that technically "ALL" Newmar coaches are not in compliance? WOW!!!
 
WOW!! The "PLOT" thickens!
"He said"!
"She said"!
And apparently, we still do not know the truth!
Were I a Newmar, "SPARTAN" chassis owner, I would have a siginificant concern!
What's the outcome?
What say you??
I’ve stated this 2 weeks ago. The outcome will be a recall by Newmar.

As Newmar keeps digging they are going to lose more of their long term unquestionable good will. They are quickly become the THOR of the industry while the Thor brands are becoming the better options.

I am 80% confident Casey Tubman loses his job.
 
redbaron......

What do you speculate will happen as a result of the NHSTA inspectors comment, relative to "ALL" the Newmar VIN stickers not being in compliance? This could really get to be a HUGE issue.....if what he said is "TRUE"!!!??
 
The sticker was never meant to be anything more than useful information for service, owner, and reference.

The sticker is irrelevant.

All other chassis have the vin on the frame. That’s what is required and all that matters.

Only Spartan chassis are in non compliance. All other platforms are safe and free from the hassle that will soon be part of every Spartan owners life.
 

§ 568.4 Requirements for incomplete vehicle manufacturers.​


(a) The incomplete vehicle manufacturer shall furnish for each incomplete vehicle, at or before the time of delivery, an incomplete vehicle document (“IVD”) that contains the following statements, in the order shown, and all other information required by this part to be included therein:

(1) Name and mailing address of the incomplete vehicle manufacturer.
(2) Month and year during which the incomplete vehicle manufacturer performed its last manufacturing operation on the incomplete vehicle.
(3) Identification of the incomplete vehicle(s) to which the document applies. The identification shall be by vehicle identification number (VIN) or groups of VINs to permit a person to ascertain positively that a document applies to a particular incomplete vehicle after the document has been removed from the vehicle.
(4) Gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of the completed vehicle for which the incomplete vehicle is intended.
(5) Gross axle weight rating (GAWR) for each axle of the completed vehicle for which the incomplete vehicle is intended, listed and identified in order from front to rear (e.g., front, first intermediate, second intermediate, rear). The ratings for any consecutive axles having identical gross axle weight ratings when equipped with tires having the same tire size designation may, at the option of the incomplete vehicle manufacturer, be stated as a single value, with the label indicating to which axles the ratings apply.

Examples of combined ratings:​

(a) All axles—2,400 kg (5,290 lb) with LT245/75R16(E) tires;
(b) Front—5,215 kg (11,500 lb) with 295/75R22.5(G) tires.

(c) First intermediate to rear—9,070 kg (20,000 lb) with 295/75R22.5(G) tires.
(6) Listing of the vehicle types as defined in 49 CFR 571.3 (e.g., truck, MPV, bus, trailer) into which the incomplete vehicle may appropriately be manufactured.
(7) Listing, by number, of each standard, in effect at the time of manufacture of the incomplete vehicle, that applies to any of the vehicle types listed in paragraph (a)(6) of this section, followed in each case by one of the following three types of statement, as applicable:

(i) Type 1—A statement that the vehicle when completed will conform to the standard if no alterations are made in identified components of the incomplete vehicle.

Example: 104-This vehicle when completed will conform to FMVSS No. 104, Windshield Wiping and Washing Systems, if no alterations are made in the windshield wiper components.
(ii) Type 2—A statement of specific conditions of final manufacture under which the manufacturer specifies that the completed vehicle will conform to the standard.

Example: 121—This vehicle when completed will conform to FMVSS No. 121, Air Brake Systems, if it does not exceed any of the gross axle weight ratings, if the center of gravity at GVWR is not higher than nine feet above the ground, and if no alterations are made in any brake system component.
(iii) Type 3—A statement that conformity with the standard cannot be determined based upon the components supplied on the incomplete vehicle, and that the incomplete vehicle manufacturer makes no representation as to conformity with the standard.
(8) Each document shall contain a table of contents or chart summarizing all the standards applicable to the vehicle pursuant to 49 CFR 568.4(a)(7).
(9) A certification that the statements contained in the incomplete vehicle document are accurate as of the date of manufacture of the incomplete vehicle and can be used and relied on by any intermediate and/or final-stage manufacturer as a basis for certification.

(b) To the extent the IVD expressly incorporates by reference body builder or other design and engineering guidance (Reference Material), the incomplete vehicle manufacturer shall make such Reference Material readily available to subsequent manufacturers. Reference Materials incorporated by reference in the IVD shall be deemed to be part of the IVD.

(c) The IVD shall be attached to the incomplete vehicle in such a manner that it will not be inadvertently detached, or alternatively, it may be sent directly to a final-stage manufacturer, intermediate manufacturer or purchaser for purposes other than resale to whom the incomplete vehicle is delivered. The Reference Material in paragraph (b) of this section need not be attached to each vehicle.


It appears that Spartan, if they sent the proper documentation to Newmar is in no way at fault. Their duty if to create a VIN and ensure that said VIN accompanies the incomplete vehicle to the final builder. Freightliner handles the marking of the incomplete vehicle for the final builders. Spartan chose not to.
It seems the debate is, does a paper label that can't be removed without destroying the label suffice. 565.13 does say a part of the vehicle, not the frame specifically. I agree with Baron on the industry standards. I have been under literally hundreds of Dodges/Rams and saw the full vin stamped in the frame. I still think there are more than a few details that need to come to light.
 
Not sure where you read that part 565 doesn't apply. This is just more detail.

The entire code has to be considered, not just select portions.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top