Here is my premise: That the quality issues Thors are famous for are likely less of an issue with class B camper vans.
Here is my reasoning: Most Class B camper vans exteriors are built by the chassis/ drive train manufacturer, correct?
Travel trailers, Class A and Class C RVs, except for the bare bones chassis, are totally fabricated by the RV manufacturer, whether Thor, Winnebago, Tiffin, etc. This includes floor, walls, roof, windows, exterior doors.
With a B, the chassis/drive train manufacturer designs and makes all of these ingredients. The RV company has little or nothing to do with over 50% of what comprises a Class B RV, unlike all the other types.
So, can it be assumed that the "quality" playing field is equalized to some extent with camper vans? And the innards, if something isn't right, is easier to fix than the roof, walls and floor would be.
Your thoughts on my observations, please.
Here is my reasoning: Most Class B camper vans exteriors are built by the chassis/ drive train manufacturer, correct?
Travel trailers, Class A and Class C RVs, except for the bare bones chassis, are totally fabricated by the RV manufacturer, whether Thor, Winnebago, Tiffin, etc. This includes floor, walls, roof, windows, exterior doors.
With a B, the chassis/drive train manufacturer designs and makes all of these ingredients. The RV company has little or nothing to do with over 50% of what comprises a Class B RV, unlike all the other types.
So, can it be assumed that the "quality" playing field is equalized to some extent with camper vans? And the innards, if something isn't right, is easier to fix than the roof, walls and floor would be.
Your thoughts on my observations, please.