Welcome to RVForums.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest RV Community on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, review campgrounds
  • Get the most out of the RV Lifestyle
  • Invite everyone to RVForums.com and let's have fun
  • Commercial/Vendors welcome

Alert WiFi LAN & WAN Channel Collision!!

Welcome to RVForums.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends and let's have fun
  • Commercial/Vendors welcome
  • Friendliest RV community on the web
Hi Neal, basically I was dealing with two issues, what Captain mentioned in post 10 was giving me repeating connect/disconnect of the clients in the event log. That stopped when I brought WiFi in on one band (2.4) and out on the other (5). The other problem was the wan port on my max transit duo is not capable of negotiating speed with Starlink adapter. It is a known issue with pepwave and involves a very old driver/firmware being used in the production of the unit. There is no fix except to put a switch inline from the Starlink to the pepwave. The symptom that pointed to this issues was a 50+ percent packet drop occurring on the wan. Things appear to be stable now.

Thank you for sharing about the WAN and Starlink issue. I have been trying to figure out why Starlink was getting so slow when going through the WAN connection on our Pepwave.

Will get a switch to try adding that as an intermediary.

Do you know if instead of negotiating the speed with “Auto”, if a fixed speed was selected does that resolve it?
 
On your pepwave go into your system and tools and ping a site from the wan.....if your model is subject to this issue you will see a huge amount of packet loss. The only workaround pepwave is offering is get yourself a cheap switch to put in line. It comes down to a really old chipset and software they used for the device that cant negotiate the speeds that starlink (and I assume any other device running at 1gps). To answer your question, some have said that selecting 100mbps helps, but others are saying no difference still loss of packets and the devices fight over setting the best speed for the connection Auto will definitely cause you to have issues.
 
I wonder if this is the same issue I experienced with my ethernet case going from PC to Pep1 (main) which is ethernet connected to Pep2 and I was getting packet loss and network instability with Verizon on Pep2. If I use Wi-Fi to connect PC to Pep1 the problem goes away. Are you connecting to your pepwave via Wi-Fi or ethernet? Also have you tried connecting to Starlink via Wi-Fi instead of ethernet and noted any difference in the situation?

Edit: The inline switch did NOT solve my issue
 
Last edited:
Hi Neal, I connect to pepwave both ways, WiFi and direct. Both ways produced the internet drops due to the pepwave using the wan connection as primary (fastest) so anything connected downstream was seeing the packet losses, and then the connecting/reconnecting of the individual devices(the WiFi collision issue). I did connect to the Starlink 5G WiFi and broadcast on the 2.4 pepwave and so far the WiFi log is clean as a whistle. Before I was getting several dozen connect/reconnect incidents per hour. Unfortunately (as usual) I seem to be troubleshooting two issues at once, so which fix did the most benefit is hard to determine. My switch showed up today, and will be installed tonight. I will report back if that fixes the packet loss issue with Starlink.
 
Sorry Neal, just re-read your post and no, I am. Not getting any packet loss connected to the lan port via hardwire, no packet loss on WiFi either. It would make sense though that they used the same hardware/driver/software combo in production for both ports, so it would be a logical assumption that it could be an issue in the right (or wrong) circumstances
 
Neal, question.....can you ping test the wan and lan connections from your respective pepwave tools menu and see any packet loss??
 
I'll be back in the coach starting Friday for several months including setting up Starlink. I will let you know what I see when I am settled in after a few days.
 
Cool, have a safe trip! Look forward to hearing how you get on with the Starlink! Ours has been very solid, but have not moved to a new location yet. Aug 1st for that.
 
Hi Neal, I connect to pepwave both ways, WiFi and direct. Both ways produced the internet drops due to the pepwave using the wan connection as primary (fastest) so anything connected downstream was seeing the packet losses, and then the connecting/reconnecting of the individual devices(the WiFi collision issue). I did connect to the Starlink 5G WiFi and broadcast on the 2.4 pepwave and so far the WiFi log is clean as a whistle. Before I was getting several dozen connect/reconnect incidents per hour. Unfortunately (as usual) I seem to be troubleshooting two issues at once, so which fix did the most benefit is hard to determine. My switch showed up today, and will be installed tonight. I will report back if that fixes the packet loss issue with Starlink.
By way of update, I did finally get the switch inline from my starlink to the pepwave wan port, and then pinged from the wan port, zero packet loss. Switch appears to be handling the speed negotiations properly. Between that and the WiFi solution from Captain, I am running solely on the pepwave transit duo wired and WiFi (no additional AP) with no issues for the first time in almost a year.
 
@Scotttkd2 I'm using an ethernet connected Starlink to Pepwave 2 which feeds into Pepwave 1. There is no switch betwee SL and Pepwave 2. There is a switch between Pepwave 2 and Pepwave 1. No packet loss noted and no issues to date (one week of use so far). I did buy a cheap switch in case I needed to put it between SL and Pepwave 2 but it seems like it won't be needed.

I can't remember where (or if you can) check port speeds in the Pepwave to see what link speed the SL to Pepwave 2 is showing. If you know that please let me know and I'll check it.

I realize too that the BR1 Pro 5G is using a better GigE network system vs. older models and maybe that's helping.

All in all I'm seeing an ideal setup with no issues thankfully.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top