Welcome to RVForums.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest RV Community on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, review campgrounds
  • Get the most out of the RV Lifestyle
  • Invite everyone to RVForums.com and let's have fun
  • Commercial/Vendors welcome

Old but new RV GPS

Welcome to our community

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends and let's have fun
  • Commercial/Vendors welcome
  • Friendliest RV community on the web

SGilbert

RVF Supporter
Joined
Mar 24, 2024
Messages
233
Location
South Bend, IN
RV Year
2018
RV Make
Thor
RV Model
Axis 25.2
RV Length
26
Chassis
Ford E450
Engine
Ford V10
TOW/TOAD
2006 Honda CR-V
Fulltimer
No
Based on my experience with Gemini at work and general LLMs - I am not sure I would blindly trust these models to route me correctly and help avoid low bridges.
Too often I have to challenge the results it comes back with, point out what I know to be wrong, and tell it to try again.
The idea is great, will just need a bit of time to convince me it’s error rate for hallucinations is minutely small.
 
I currently use RV Life Trip Wizard for planning and navigation and am quite happy with it. I am, however anxiously awaiting the release of Google's maps update. You make a good point about the new version's reliability and will use it in conjunction with RVTW to prove it out.
 
AI hallucinations largely occur when the information provided is subjective. AI is highly sycophantic, analogous to relying on company a** ki**ers to keep the boss informed. GROK being the poster child for telling the user what they want to hear.
Not sure if a map and routing app would however be subject to AI misinformation since it's more "if this, then that", than it is heuristics.
 
I will stick with m Garmin RV as a primary. I do use google as a secondary.
 
Based on my experience with Gemini at work and general LLMs - I am not sure I would blindly trust these models to route me correctly and help avoid low bridges.
Too often I have to challenge the results it comes back with, point out what I know to be wrong, and tell it to try again.
The idea is great, will just need a bit of time to convince me it’s error rate for hallucinations is minutely small.
I have found, too many times, that RV Life Pro, which uses Here maps, has errors I just cannot live with.

My primary, as stated, is Waze (Google Maps) and use Apple Maps as a backup when Waze does hiccup, which it has on several occasions.

I also like the time & distance to my destination, BUT also want waypoint information. That is where my Apple Maps falls into place. Luckily, I can run both simultaneously with main, in dash, 10" unit and my iPhone in a holder in front of me.
 
I haven't had any bad experiences with RV life pro yet and run it in tandem with my Garmin 1095. The Garmin rarely deviates from the RV life route by any significant amount and it provides real time traffic info for me just fine.

I work with AI in my job and like Memories I'm leery of relying on it in a "real time" environment.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom