first, thank you.
I am not sure I am surprised, and I am impressed by your suggestion...have genuinely felt since day one here that you had your arms around this.
I hope, however, you will still permit me to ask the following (my perspective includes that I am a longtime amateur radio opererator who is going to use some of this solar power to run what is called "emcom", an acronym for "emergency communications", which I am interested in to help people in emergencises, such as hurricanes).......and I have for many years, always understood the need...in many areas, never mind that I am no expert in this area as you obviously are............... for grounds for performance, and/or safety). That said, then, and if I may:
1. where would you make the disconnection? right at the frame, itself?
2. would you have made this same suggestion if these were not lithiums but rather the original AGMs?
3. do you think the ground was a bad idea to begin with (I am wondering why the factory put it there in the first place)
4. am I the first case where you concluded that the ground was a possible or actual issue (due to the above, I am well aware that, generally speaking, grounds can also be sources of trouble as well as wellsprings of performance and safety, so I am not suggesting you have not discovered fire on this one)
5. is the suggestion related only to magnum or do you see issues with other equipment performing the same function, such as midnite or victron, just to name a few (to wit, I am about to finish creating that seond unconnected system I mentioned, and there are plenty of places to ground equipment with instructions to do so..such as with midnite's combiner box, through which on this SECOND system i keep mentioning I am, indeed, using their combiner box which will also go to chassis ground, albeit in the trailer rear, where I had a ground busbar type strip put into the trailer at the time it was made, albeit for radio purposes (without proper grounding of various kinds of equipment, one of the issues can definitely be heavy radio frequency interference with receivers and transmitters.
6. because "grounds" in so many areas, can be related to safety or performance or both, even as you are reluctant to discuss your logic, would you consider giving me at least a most basic, general idea as to why you have come to this conclusion?
you asked me about this ground previously, so it does not surprise me that you find that an area of interest.
and again, thank you so very much!