For those of us still not invested in a cell antenna, modem and router. Which way would the experienced users advise us to go? Starlink or cell?
Randy,
An interesting question & there are most likely as many responses as there are people. I'll start my response by suggesting you assess your internet connectivity needs, how often & where you travel & how much you are willing to spend.
An ideal solution, from my perspective, is one that will allow you to take advantage of every signal that is available;
cellular, land line cable, WiFi & satellite.
I am not convinced, in my case, 5G cellular is worth the $300.00 (approximate) premium for the 5G modem at this point in time. Instead, I have gone with the Peplink MAX BR1 PRO 4G. The same basic device Neal is using, but with a CAT-20 4G modem in lieu of a CAT-20 5G modem.
We also have a Stralink Dishy we intend to integrate into our network to see if it will be reliable enough to eliminate one of our cellular data plans.
Sadly, I am not fortunate enough to have one of the 'grandfathered unlimited data plans' so my expense for cellular data for my primary line is comparable to what I will be paying for Stalink. Your cost for data, be it cellular or satellite should be factored into your cost.
So my response to your question, get the best of both worlds; cellular & Starlink. Go with a 4G CAT-20 modem (savings of approx $300.00), use the provided paddle antennas (saving approximately $300.00 - $500.00 over an external antenna) & spring for the Starlink. I suspect your initial expenses for hardware will be about the same. Depending on your cellular data plans, you could come out slightly ahead or behind.
Just my $0.02 worth, it's an option to consider.