Welcome to RVForums.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest RV Community on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, review campgrounds
  • Get the most out of the RV Lifestyle
  • Invite everyone to RVForums.com and let's have fun
  • Commercial/Vendors welcome

Alert Battleborn battery safety alert

  • Thread starter Thread starter Neal
  • Start date Start date
  • Featured

Welcome to our community

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends and let's have fun
  • Commercial/Vendors welcome
  • Friendliest RV community on the web
I'm not saying there isn't a problem , because obviously they have a horrible design (plastic between conductors as a thermal protection is extreme stupidity)

But I don't think his test is realistic to talk world use and why they've probably ginger this long without issue.

For example I have 6x 100 ah batteries. I NEVER discharge or recharge at full capacity, and would never do it back to back to back continuously until it failed.

My two big consumers are my 12vdc air conditioner that pulls between 60-90 amps for as long as 14 hours (that's how long I've used it). Or my induction cooktop which will pull up to 150 amps for ass long as I cook 30 -60 minutes.

No where near max capacity. I charge with 900 watts of solar and a 120amp alternator charger so I've seen 200 amps charge for a few hours before (it goes up and down because sun is rarely constant) again not near the max capacity and duration.
 
Extremely poor design. He is not even trying to draw the battery ratings. Imagine if he did. If I had BB batteries, they would be going back or to a recycler. Who wants to gamble after seeing the poor internal design
 
I dodged a bullet by not being able to afford BB batteries.....LOL! Loving my Wattcycles so far.
 
I'm not saying there isn't a problem , because obviously they have a horrible design (plastic between conductors as a thermal protection is extreme stupidity)

But I don't think his test is realistic to talk world use and why they've probably ginger this long without issue.

For example I have 6x 100 ah batteries. I NEVER discharge or recharge at full capacity, and would never do it back to back to back continuously until it failed.

My two big consumers are my 12vdc air conditioner that pulls between 60-90 amps for as long as 14 hours (that's how long I've used it). Or my induction cooktop which will pull up to 150 amps for ass long as I cook 30 -60 minutes.

No where near max capacity. I charge with 900 watts of solar and a 120amp alternator charger so I've seen 200 amps charge for a few hours before (it goes up and down because sun is rarely constant) again not near the max capacity and duration.
He is only charging and discharging them at their design parameters. How can you argue with that? Just because you baby yours and they haven't failed yet? In fact he only put them at 60 amps with a 100 amp BMS....He is not a crackpot and this is not going to end well for BB or their customers.
 
Someone assumed no one would ever look inside one of their batteries. Probably a safe assumption, until the failure draws them in.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom