Welcome to RVForums.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest RV Community on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, review campgrounds
  • Get the most out of the RV Lifestyle
  • Invite everyone to RVForums.com and let's have fun
  • Commercial/Vendors welcome

CA strikes again with CARB ACT

Welcome to RVForums.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends and let's have fun
  • Commercial/Vendors welcome
  • Friendliest RV community on the web
The solution is simple. The new EPA administrator should simply revoke the waiver under the Clean Air Act that allows CARB (a State agency) to preempt Federal Laws (ie Clean Air Act).

See this link for details. Elections matter.
Or Doge may do it for us.
 
Or the SCOTUS reversal of the Chevron Deference may play a part! Who knows.
 
Here is what the chevron doctrine is according to google ai summary:
1732928116065.png
 
As per your link, the mining industry has not been problematic.

Are you suggesting we stop using lithium in products?
Just suggesting that lithium is not a clean energy.

Takes more petroleum to bring it to market and manufacture components than it saves in its life span.

It has its place, as I don’t want a gas powered laptop, but for cars it’s not a market viable solution. We need to get off petroleum but lithium isn’t the solution.

The mines destroy the land, and the slave labor and corruption around the industry is terrible.

And of course there is the new attack on legitimate land owners in the us that are having floods and storms used as a way to take their land so that lithium can be mined for profit of greedy corporations.
 
Chilis indigenous people are losing natural water due to corporate greed and lithium mining. This is driven by CARB mandates for battery powered cars ands it’s killing the ecosystem and the local people.

 
Is nuclear power "clean energy"? I would imagine the radioactivity aspect is not clean. Yet we need it, and IMHO need more nuclear power plants across the country. Harnessing the power from the sun I personally think is a good idea but yeah, we are seeing affects from it supposedly but there is a lot of energy coming from the sun that may be better than alternatives. Sure, we'd all like to live in a way that none of this has to happen, but what are the options? I would imagine our power consumption from computers and phones becoming widespread from the 90's drastically affected power grids, increased population and homes required, on and on. While we can attack any energy source, we have to figure out what's the lesser evil I suppose, but we need and always will need "more power."
 

Latest resources

Back
Top