Welcome to RVForums.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest RV Community on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, review campgrounds
  • Get the most out of the RV Lifestyle
  • Invite everyone to RVForums.com and let's have fun
  • Commercial/Vendors welcome

(Live Updates) Florida 1/14 to 1/23 - Tampa show + real world use

Welcome to our community

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends and let's have fun
  • Commercial/Vendors welcome
  • Friendliest RV community on the web
@Rory (Lightship Team) … great post on Instagram. You had me worried! When I saw 1.44 mpKWH I almost panicked … until you mentioned that was with TrekDrive off … phew 😮‍💨 😮‍💨 😮‍💨!

I’ve already bought into AE.1’s aero + TrekDrive delivering close to Tow Vehicle standard efficiency (I believe the website now says within 5% to 10% which I think is a very safe claim)
and having more and more reinforcement of that data via real world use cases, in cross winds no less, is immensely reassuring.

I suspect you guys are running a series of test scenarios against baseline efficiencies to satisfy a hungry audience. I’m also interested in understanding why you’re making some of those choices. E.g., driving with Trek Drive off … was that a test scenario or were you low on Tow Vehicle range and knew you’d pull into serviced camping, etc.

I’m hungry for the “what” which you guys are increasingly providing data upon, as well as the “why” to speed up my own learning curve come April.

Keep the content coming. Great stuff.
 
Hahah! Sounds great, and noted your earlier points of request. By the way, we’ve got the giant QR up for you guys!
IMG_7189.jpeg
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom